Why does it matter if you created the body or not when the afks are afk and didn't see you create the body nor see the body anyways? I get that people kill afks near unideds under the assumption that a T killed the unided and ran away without killing the other guy, but all of that is only suspicion, the afk isn't identifying the body because they're afk, in both cases.
You created the T act that you are killing them for. You would have no other reason to kill that person, but you are actively seeking out and creating reasons to kill people who haven’t done anything to deserve it.
Yeah, but I had legitimate reason to create the unided body, they probably committed a traitorous act or were called out. I don't see how it would be any different from a unided body created by another person. Wasn't the reason you can kill afks for traitorous acts "because you don't know if they're really afk"? I'm sure no one actually believes the afks aren't afk when they kill them for unideds, nobody pretends to be afk, but it's still not considered toxic.. unless there's some major difference that I'm not seeing because I'm already too toxic.
So a T begins shooting you at spawn with several AFKs nearby. Clearly the T wanted to kill the person who wasn't AFK (you), but he loses. You kill all of the AFKs in spawn for GBA. There is no logical reason to assume everyone or anyone in that room is a traitor, hence why it's toxic. It's just shooting people to shoot people and get away with it. Another layer of toxicity we can add is if you don't ID the body, and claim they were all standing near an UnID body you could have easily IDed yourself All of this is assuming it's before overtime, because you can do whatever the fuck you want to AFKs in overtime.
Instead of Iding the body and moving on, you decided to leave it on AFK players, who you know wont ID the bodies because they are AFK. Sure, they did commit the act, but that don't mean you can use that act to kill them, just for the sake of killing them. Toxicity is often times determined based on the circumstances anyways, so I can't say that it would always be toxic, just that in some cases it can be.
breaking the rules then harassing the person who reported you for breaking the rules is pretty toxic, ngl
getting somebody banned for 4 weeks for something they didn't even realize was a bannable offense is pretty toxic, ngl
saying somebody's derailing a thread after stating what is toxic when the thread is named "what is considered toxic" is pretty toxic, ngl
"You both have your strong points and your weak areas! Instead of vilifying each other, don't be afraid to learn something about yourselves and who you are from each other!" ngl
So a how to be me guide? awh you shouldn't have I'm blushing so hard uwu. Thank you <3 You made my day
here's a pretty good chart to understand if you're toxic or not without all the words: do you suck mods'/admins' dicks? then you're not toxic do you NOT suck mods'/admins' dicks? then you are toxic it's just that simple
idk about y’all but there is good toxic and bad toxic and the good toxic are my favorite types of people. Didn’t hear that from me though.