Invalid Report against Special Agent BioHazard

Discussion in 'TTT Staff/Player Reports' started by Jackrabbit Jake, Aug 10, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Name of Staff/Player:
    Special Agent BioHazard
    Steam ID of Staff/Player:
    STEAM_0:0:11088274
    Your Steam ID:
    N/A
    Which Server:
    East 2
    Which Map:
    67thway
    Which Round:

    Time of Occurence:

    Reason For Report:
    I was discussing this with Agent A, but im not sure what happened. Regardless I decided to make this report.

    Speical Agent BioHazard was hacking
    (Video shows aimbot and possibly bhoping)​
    Evidence And/Or Witnesses:
     
  2. BioHazard

    BioHazard VIP

    I'll be responding to this report in the morning.
    @Agent A (Since he was there)
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2017
  3. BioHazard

    BioHazard VIP

    Okay, first and foremost I would like to thank you for trying to keep our servers clean, hackers as of late have been a plague on the server and should most definitely be reported.
    As you can see here in this link, (https://www.seriousgmod.com/search/11918270/) I have reported many a hacker myself; I believe it is one of the things that can single handedly ruin SGMOD.

    In your reasons you claim that I was bunny hopping, I can assure you here that I was indeed bunny hopping, and that no such thing is against the rules nor should it be. Anyone can bunny hop, it is quite simple and by no means do I have a script to hop in such a way (I'm actually pretty bad at it). Secondly you claim that I was aimbotting, and I will provide evidence as to my skill in general on first person PC shooters.

    [​IMG]

    As you can see in this screenshot, (and there are more on my profile: http://steamcommunity.com/id/BioHazardX7/) I am of a fairly high rank on CS:GO with no active VAC bans on my account because it was legitimately me playing. You can see my many hours on both CS:GO and Garry's Mod as well as other screenshots. My ability to play the game well and legitimately can easily be verified with MANY previous and current staff as well as players I have played with. Players like @Will-e can comment
    on my style of aim. Now onto the matter of the dropbox video that @Bacon has posted. First I would like to direct your attention to the following screenshot.

    [​IMG]

    As you can see Bacon had a ping of just 14 at the time of this screenshot. I personally saw it go as low as six. I would like to point out that this is atypical, and in my experience usually points to adjusted rates or networking conditions. Considering this, I can easily see how a spectator view from said player may look distorted in some way or not representative of my actual point of view or shooting in general. I believe this combined with the low frame rate and resolution of Bacon's video leads to my aim appearing
    less smooth than it was in reality. Generally how I aim is I jerk my mouse towards peoples heads, then slightly away, and then jerk back to the head once again.

    Any players on at the time i'm sure can attest to the fact that I was not hacking including @gamingtroll and Agent A (I know Agent wasn't there at the time of recording however). My evidence is innocence is the fact that I am a longstanding member of this community, the witnesses on the server, my skill as a player in general, and the unreliability of the video footage. I thank you all for your time and consideration.
     
  4. Agent A

    Agent A Veni, vidi, vici VIP Silver Emerald

    Sorry about that, @Bacon .
    I left the server during that time as I was asking other admins on their opinions on the report.

    The overall consensus is that the evidence here is not conclusive enough to say he is hacking.

    Bhopping is perfectly fine to do unless the person is scripting, using macros to bhop, or using cheats to bhop. So far, your video doesn't show enough evidence of him doing such.

    As for the aimbot claim, there is just not enough evidence to support your claims of aimbot.

    Report: Invalid.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.