Hey, I was told to "rules lawyer something else" regarding this report: https://www.seriousgmod.com/threads/tz-s-appeal.55319/ Only thing I pointed out was that there were two official accounts of harassment, not three, and at the very least the report verdict should amended to state that, not incorrectly state three. What am I missing? -MERGED- Also, before I get "here's one slur, heres two slur, heres three slur!" keep in mind the "like a faggot" mention as no evidence of the victim actually feeling harassed (a simple pm could prove otherwise). It's just a blanketed slur without that
I thought it was a blanket rule slurs were harassment if they were targeted at someone, regardless of if the target felt harassed or not and they were only allowed if they weren't targeted at anyone. Or am i incorrect?
From the Extended Rules: So yes, the rule seen here would suggest that any targeting with slurs (regardless if the "victim" felt harassed or not) would count as harassment.
