Scenario 1: - Say you see a traitor kill someone under the bed on dolls, - you shoot the traitor and a third person who was with you also shoots AT the traitor, - the traitor manages to duck around the corner and teleport away. - Afterwards, you are in a sniping position and see the third person who shot at the traitor and the traitor walking together on the floor, - neither player is shooting each other. Question 1: 1) Can you kill the third person for gba, seeing as they witnessed the traitor kill someone and teleport away, but aren't shooting them anymore now that I am not there? ----- Scenario 2: This one is a minimalist scenario to explore how little a person has to do to not be GBA, it isn't very useful or realistic. - You see a traitor shoot you in the chest, it does 50 damage - you shoot the traitor and a third person, next to the traitor, takes a single shot towards the traitor with their pistol - the traitor runs away and the third person turns around and runs the other way. Question 2: 2) Can you still shoot the third person for gba, seeing as they let the traitor get away after having only taken one shot?
1) GBA is voided by him shooting at the player, him not acting later could be caused by many reasons but isn't a T act or GBA, and its never a T act or GBA to be near a KOS'd player. 2) GBA is voided by him shooting at the player, him going the other way could be caused by many reasons but isn't a T act or GBA in it self.
What Temar says is the most accurate. The third player shooting at the Traitor voids them being guilty by association, and being seen together later is the same as being with a KOSed player, that is to say, they are not themselves KOSed. In both cases the behaviour of the third player is suspicious, but not KOSable.
