Classify Porn Cover-Up Sprays as Disturbing Content

Please don't derail the thread

 

I am so sorry. I hope you can find it in your heart to forgive me for my actions. I simply wasn't thinking at the time of that post and that resulted in an error of my ways. Pls pretty please.

 

Imagine if lightning saw marshal and his friends old sprays. Pinacle of comedy.

 

@

What about this? This cool with you?

 

this whole thread is gay

 

@Pokeben10 : The following quote sums up the definition of what I want to see banned.

NO! Pictures of women in swimwear, provided all the naughty bits are properly covered up, should not be banned.

I don't know about that one. The appendage on the backside looks awfully much like a penis and testicles to me.

 

I can't tell u enough how much i am against this.
Because of the following questions that have to be answered beforehand:
- what is considered to be a porn spray
- Then: what is considered to be a cover-up? Clothes or stuff like foodobjects
- If cloths are also considerd a cover-up, is posting a selfie also a banned spray?
- If clothes aint a cover-up, are hentai-oriented cartoon sprays allowed?

At the end of the day i think this will start to lead to only having logo's allowed, no human nor animal forms. This is a really bad thing imo since its a ban on sharing ur voice through ur spray. Something which is a thing in terrorist countries, not in the free world of which the server is a part of

 

There's just too many examples and gray areas of what can be considered porn/graphic/disturbing sprays.
Everyone has their definition or whats disturbing to them so there isn't a way to box certain sprays into said category.
In the attempt to censor such things without a "set in stone" definition is impossible since there are so many loopholes & examples to this definition and rule.
If no one is complaining about it and it's fine, is it really disturbing, or is it disturbing to just you and then you deem it punishable and disturbing on bias views.
Or if 1 person complains and you don't find it disturbing, do you still do something about it or say the spray is completely fine cuz that one person is complaining.
This is just a rule/topic that needs to be taken care of case by case and used with best judgment of the staff. just don't use your personal bias on what you feel is and isn't allowed.

 

The free speech card? We are talking about porn on a server children play on, not your political opinion.

When you argue against it because it is too difficult to enforce, you agree that it is a problem?
Just make it another rule for admin descretion. Easy.
I would not want my children to see the sprays some people have here.

 

Easy

 

Great, so close thread and keep it the same? I don't think were going to stumble upon a better system without significant work.

 

How about a 'report' section for player to submit a spray, so staff can review it and nobody has to worry about spreading potentially 'disturbing' content on the forums?
Obviously a PM works, but a different section just might be more efficient, if it's this much of an issue.

 

This is a great idea, actually. Give players with edgy sprays the chance to get their spray whitelisted, if they don't want to be bothered by staff occasionally.

 

Oh noes I can't troll with sprays anymore. However will I cope to be edgy? Ah I know. Might put a porn link in chat. That'll show them

 

That's an ez ban though. And that rarely happened when we didn't have sprays enabled at all

 

If you had read my post just previous to the one you posted, you would've seen a literal definition of what I want to be banned.

What I want banned are images of porn that have been "covered up" in various ways, but the cover up doesn't hide the fact that the image is from a pornographic source.

I'd support this full bore.

 

this has no relation on this thread. what your talking about is a change in the punishments for current spray rules while this thread is talking about changing the rules