Invalid Report against Doben

Name of Staff/Player:

Doben​

Steam ID of Staff/Player:

STEAM_0:1:68848310​

Your Steam ID:

STEAM_0:1:51392412​

Which Map:

Dolls​

Which Round:

I have no idea.​

Time of Occurence:

Around 12:30​

Reason for Report:

I killed a person for walking past unid body, it was the unid body of a traitor yet it was still unid. He said he was on a ladder but he still walked past it on his way so I killed him. When I asked why I was being slain, Doben said it was just suspicion. This is completely false and when I told Doben this, I got no reply. I tried to tell him/her this and they would not reply or try to talk it out and continued to ignore me so I now have to do this.


I tried to reason http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=803403057


Unhappy getting on the server and not talking to me. I don't know why he got on but he immediately got off after talking to Doben. Doben was in the wrong completely so I don't know why this wasn't discussed with me.
http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198063050553/screenshots/

I request that Doben be immiedately demoted to trial-mod because the only response to this is negligence, ignorance to rules, or just plain lying.​

Evidence And/Or Witnesses:

No exact names but collin, christian, doben herself even said it was just suspicion which is plain wrong. Unhappy face came on himself and I tried to talk to him and was ignored again.


http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=803403129


Two links to the screenshot

Edited spelling errors, i'm retarded so you know​

 

Moved to TTT reports.

 

Tagging @Doben and her admin @Opalium . Please be patient as Doben respond.

 

I witnessed this, Doben slayed Bryan because he "killed on suspicion", when in fact I witnessed, and Bryan claimed in his report that the player was near unid'd bodies. This was 100% a false slay. Upon giving this slay to Bryan there was NO explanation after Bryan tried several times to elicit a response from her. I do not believe she should be mod.

 

Hi @BryanTehHero2 ,

Thank you for giving your time to report me.

First I will share the evidence I got with my admin @Opalium so please be patient at that time.

 

Or you could post it here for everyone to see. I don't know why you have to share evidence with a higher up, it's a game.

 

Hi again @BryanTehHero2 ,

Sorry for late response.
I attached the evidences that I got as videos below.

This is the first one that I wanted to share with you. Here you can also obviously see that the player that you killed was going down from the top and not passing through the un id body as you said.
Besides, from the position that he stands, it is impossible to see the un id body because of the body was being blocked by the frames in front of it.



And this is the second video that I had for ensuring that the player you killed was standing on the top and not passing through the un id before you arrived to that platform.
So, that also means that you were not sure about that player you killed passed through that un id and you killed him "on suspicion" as I already mentioned it before.
In short, this is why you were slain by me because of killing another on suspicion.




As I already shared these videos with my admin @Opalium I'm leaving the final word to him.

 

@BryanTehHero2

As seen in the above videos, the player you killed never passed the unided body or was even aware of it. He was climbing down the ladder facing the other direction, and even if he would look the other way, the body was hidden behind the frames on the platform. This leads to the conclusion that the player was unaware of that body.
Now, the unided body rule is meant to take effect only in cases where a player is aware of the body, yet decides not to try and ID it or just leaves it as is. In the case we have here, this does not apply - like I said, the player never had the chance to see the body and thus couldn't take action against it.

Due to the above reasons, I can conclude that the slay was valid and nothing incorrect was done. Therefore, I will be marking this report as INVALID.

Thank you for time,
~Opalium