yes but u banned him first before reviewing anything Like bruh, Dolphy's been here for a couple months now. He also played back in 2017. Did you ever consider he was just good?
Admins tell mods to send evidence into the bunker if they are unsure or the evidence isn't clear for additional opinions. That doesn't mean that the mod always follow that advice/post in bunker. Mod will probably be talked to about what happened and will be more careful in the future, repeat with another mod later on. Idk what this thread is going to achieve. Realistically the admins do everything they can to try and prevent this from happening other than forcing mods to give evidence in all cases (which isn't a good idea).
So the protocol is to show an admin first, before a ban? How so, there aren't always hackers joining every hour or so
What do you expect from a mod that barely plays? He is still very new and is still learning how to staff. Dolphy is a very good player and everybody knows that. The mods and I don't expect him to hack on the servers. After the mod shared the clip, we decided to unban him and review it.
From what ive heard he didnt just ban me alone. He had talked about it with others beforehand and was told to do it. As of right now I am unbanned but it is still under review.
https://www.seriousgmod.com/threads/make-hacking-a-permabannable-offense.53431/page-6#post-565420 @RFcoil
If you have a blatant hacker on and you needed to get and admin to approve it... You can see how this would be an issue if no admin was available. It is guideline to send evidence to admins if the evidence is borderline or you are unsure if its enough
imagine using some dogshit gyazo gif of 2 shots to ban an ex-staff member who is held in very high regard as a good player
