Invalid Report against Nuno and possible others?

Name of Staff/Player:

Nuno and possible others?​

Steam ID of Staff/Player:

Staff​

Your Steam ID:

<---- under my name​

Which Server:

East 1​

Which Map:

many​

Which Round:

many​

Time of Occurence:

now 2pm ingame, but been many hours​

Reason For Report:

2 Reasons for report

- ref: https://www.seriousgmod.com/threads/report-against-slaps.55873/
slaps is AFK avoiding and delaying on an active server, @Nuno is suppose to be handling but neither him or any other staff have bothered to actually pop on and fspec him (obvious thing to do immediately)

- Melodica Man™ was warned and banned for simply posting a tag which was very much relevant and in no way involved him self in the report other than the tag, this is something that shouldn't happen, and can probably find several lead admin comments on the matter if needed​

Evidence And/Or Witnesses:

​

 

and ofc at the time of this post slaps is still doing it, so if someone could be so kind as to deal with that

 

Hi there Temar, Thank you for your report.

I am currently going through demos sent by Noctorious regarding Slaps afking and avoiding the anti-afk system.
The warning point on Bad Adult has nothing to do with me, nor Voca.

As I stated in the report I was handling the situation, as I'm reviewing the Demo Files.

 

Also gonna tag @Spitefulvenom as they gave the warning to Melodica

 

Hi There Temar i gave Melodica Man his warning point today as i had already given him a verbal warning last week and since then he has went on to comment on another two reports hence his ban. I have explained my reasoning to Lordy who can determine if the point was warranted or not.

 

Sooo the report part being against Nuno would be invalid as he didnt do anything wrong here was watching the demos before he would deal with the issue, and he didnt toss in the warning point that Melodica was warned for

So that part I will be leaving as Invalid

I leave the report open for @Lordyhgm to conclude the report that seems to be against @Spitefulvenom for the warning point.

 

As spite says Bad had been asked to avoid commenting on appeals/reports and had continued to do so, earning a warning point in process. They appealed it with Spite and the point was expired. So I'll conclude this as invalid against Spite as their warning point was warranted and the correct procedure was taken to resolve it.