Your dog covers up it's chest erotically with a sexually into it face while sprawling? Mine typically looks like... The hands arent on its chest (actually sprawling a bit themselves) and the face isn't erotically turned on. It is manspreaded a little tho which is cool i guess, but yeah. It's not the behavior you are assigning it at all; it's sexually charged. If a doe with a butt can go bye bye so can this. The argument I'm trying to make is that it's so fucking extra to remove pictures of animals with butts (something spongebob has been doing a long long time) and just handle the content case by case, which you guys were doing a great job of. Really dumb to make an initiative to remove content like Lola Bunny fanart just because its a rabbit with tits with no gentalia, especially when nilz can post a black man with female nipples in shoutbox.
Full disclosure, I don't even have a dog. Tell Parmesan I said hi though. (Sorry if I'm misremembering your dog's name.) I don't really see how hand positions make an image sexual versus not sexual. Also the facial expression is a dog with its tongue out, which is something I've seen dogs do. They like to lick everything. SpongeBob is cool. The thing is we weren't doing a great job with this specific genre of disturbing, because certain players were going out of their way to get as close to the edge of 'pornographic' without getting a ban for fun. So by clarifying our Disturbing Content criteria in this way, we can better handle these issues going forward. You may think it was a dumb move, a few people do, but the majority of people are in favor of this from what I have seen. Highwon deemed it worthy of doing when we talked to him about it during the Leadership Meeting. I'm gonna need to see the source of those nipples RIGHT NOW @nilz .
I still disagree. I've contacted Highwon for his opinion, waste of time to keep going back and forth otherwise. That's not parmesan btw random internet dog