We have never ever stacked mass RDM ban offenses, only RDM related offenses that were stacking based off of SoL were RDM and leave bans. o.o What may could have caused a longer Mass RDM ban would be discretion, if the player had history or something o.o
I've just thought about something that might work for this: Punishments RDM 1st Offense - 1 Autoslay 2nd Offense - 2 Autoslays 3rd Offense - Simple Mass RDM 4th Offense - Aggravated Mass RDM Simple Mass RDM 1st Offense - 1 Day Ban 2nd Offense - 2 Day Ban 3rd Offense - 5 Day Ban 4th Offense - 2 Week Ban 5th+ Offense - 2x Longer Global Ban than the Previous One Aggravated Mass RDM 1st Offense - 5 Day Ban 2nd Offense - 2 Week Ban 3rd Offense - 4 week Ban 4th+ Offense - 2x Longer Global Ban than the Previous One Please note the terminology of "Simple Mass RDM" and "Aggravated Mass RDM" can be tweaked if need be. Can I get some feedback from the community of what they think of this proposed punishment table? Thanks!
I like this idea, though I'm not sure about how I feel about stacking "Simple" Mass RDM bans. ATM we don't do anything like that. Mass RDM (3) should always be a day unless history requires an extension (i.e. 10+ offenses) I could get on board with stacking the more serious, "Aggravated" offenses of Mass RDM
There's no need to make it more complicated by having mass rdm x3 and x4 be different kinds of offenses(they don't seem to stack each other), mass rdm 3 really doesn't need to be a ban either, paci's idea was fine
Tbh, if there is a change, then there should be an erasure of everyone who got banned for MassRDMx3. Clear all the bans, otherwise things will be even more toxic...trust me. (by clear bans, i mean clear them all from the accounts of everyone who has gotten them, cause i know there is a record for everyone)
I get you report a lot you REALLY do but it doesn’t have to all be in one round if u accidentally kill 2 people one map and legit do it once more ur calling that aggravated? Most mods would either just understand a accident and ask for discretion or have to ban for mass rdm however I wouldn’t call it “Aggravated” as it was never intentional
I'm sorry, but I'm against having RDMx3 be only 1 day if there is a history of it. People might take advantage of it and stop at 3 RDM's every time so that they don't get the longer bans. However I will agree that there needs to be more increments before getting to the level of severity of the "RDM4+" bans. I' be open to making the following edit to the proposed "Simple Mass RDM" punishment table: 1st offense - 1 Day Ban 2nd Offense - 2 Day Ban 3rd offense - 3 Day Ban 4th offense - 5 Day Ban 5th offense - 2 week ban 6th offense - 2x Longer Global ban than the previous one. Would this be any better @Python~ ? @Goldengaming2015 , I 'd propose all RDMx3 bans prior to the implementation of my proposed punishment table be considered as outside the Statute of Limitations kept by SGM, and then go forward with everyone being at 0 offenses. @Nagisa This is why I said in my post with the proposed punishment table that the terminology could be changed if needed. Maybe call it "Complex Mass RDM" or "Compound Mass RDM"?
People can do this right now tho. And like I said, a history would be the exception to a 1 days ban with Mass RDM (3), as it is now. As I said in my initial response: I just don't think 3 RDMs is a huge amount to stack bans off of. This gives players the benefit of the doubt, as it is very easy to RDM 3 people with no bad intentions. We should keep the stacking for 4 or more RDMs.
Where are you getting 6 slays from? EDIT: Nvm, I just figured it out. First offence (kill one person round 1): 1 slay Second offence (Kill one person round 3): 2 slays Third Offence (Kill one person round 6): 3 slays adds up to 6 slays
Same round offenses are just 1 slay per rdm. Been a minute since I was staff but I doubt that's changed, no?