@HelixSpiral If one water molecule is not wet then how does it suddenly become wet when bonded with another water molecule which is not wet by itself?
okie dokie, personally being wet is having water tension in contact with you, so skin, potatoes and the top of the lake, but only the top because that's the only place where water tension occurs on a body of water. Fish aren't considered wet because they are submerged in water and therefore have broken the water tension, however pull the same fish out of water and it will have water tension. Trust me I'm a scientist apparently and somehow are aloud to take biology, physics and chemistry as an A level.
With the logic of it has to be covered by a liquid to be wet. Then just look at some saltwater from the ocean that will get rainwater from a cloud. Its 2 different water molecules that will cover each other or blend, thereby making eachother wet. Now end this discussion please x.x
@HelixSpiral https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg15320693-200-science-what-really-makes-water-wet/ check this out sir
Cool! So this answers what I was saying earlier and what I suspected. They didn't really address what makes water "wet" in this paper (note; I only read the article, not the paper- $35 paywall noty), but rather water makes water fluid.
Are you guys seriously still going even after literally having a satirical blog written about how pointless this is?
Oh shit a satirical blog wrote about something so now we literally can't discuss it anymore Pack it up bois
@HelixSpiral but the paper explains that water doesn't act as a liquid until there are six molecules. doesn't that change the conclusion on if water is wet or not?
No, because that's not entirely true. It's addressing that water doesn't act fluid like a liquid until their are six molecules; the properties of water that make it 'wet' arn't addressed here- the adhesion/cohesive properties of water.