Rejected Let Users Ignore Developers

Nobody in particular led to the creation of this thread

No reason we shouldn't be allowed to. I understand TTT/DR staff, but devs aren't really necessary in appeals or reports so

I mean, when you have a dev whose custom title is "Chief Instigator" and whose name literally has "toxic" in it, can you blame me for wanting to ignore them?

For the time being:

 

I agree it's not like their warnings have any more backing/seriousness/meaning than a common user. It's not like they can dish out bans. They just like any other commoner ask for a mod/admin to intervene and they deal with it.

Let us ignore them!


Edit: To elaborate...

We cannot ignore staff for the primary reason of them requiring giving us warnings for whatever we do if it's breaking the rules. Considering their goal is to promote a positive environment and have us learn from our mistakes we have to see what they say in order for that goal to be realized. If we don't abide, we'll get banned because their warnings are official considering they have the power to ban us (or at least admins... mods just have warning power). However, not once have I ever seen a developer in STTT/SGM history act as if they were a staff member dishing out warnings and have any powers to ban users for not listening. They only develop content for the community and not enforce the rules of the community. They're glorified community members for a good reason, but that doesn't mean their words should have to be seen regardless of what they say considering their goal isn't to "promote a positive environment and have us learn from our mistakes" but instead create content. We don't need to know what content they're creating.

 

I mean.. you should be able to ignore staff too.
If they warn you and you can't read it that sounds more like a -you- problem. As long the staff did their job its up to you if you choose to ignore them or not, concequences are yours.

 

We'll make an exclusive exception so that you can ignore me Python, don't hate on @PixeL and @irritatingness for your personal vendettas.

 

Dont worry Rick, ill never ignore you.

 

idk what you're talking about

 

Let Python ignore Rick*

 

@Han Solo please recreate this suggestion so it can be approved thank

 

Wondering if there is any reasoning at all that people who disagree with this suggestion can give as to why we shouldn't be allowed to ignore devs?

Don't worry, if this suggestion is accepted, I'm positive I won't be the only one

 

yes... then i can finally ignore @PixeL

 

Thing is, only a small number of people (you and a handful others which I'm sure even DieKasta can count) wish to ignore one developer in particular. I don't see the benefit of adding this when you can simple not read what Rick has to say

 

Sometimes that's difficult when his custom title is "Chief Instigator" and he lives by that motto. Also, you could literally say "don't read what they have to say" about anyone you wish to ignore
Not to mention that making this change, according to @irritatingness, would be a simple check of a box

 

Yo fuck @PixeL tbh

 

Code:

// ==UserScript==
// @name         Taigachat HardIgnore
// @namespace    seriousgmod.com
// @version      1.0
// @description  Literally deletes anyones messages you want
// @author       Xproplayer
// @include      https://www.seriousgmod.com/chat/
// @include      https://www.seriousgmod.com/chat/popup
// @include      https://www.seriousgmod.com/
// @grant        none
// ==/UserScript==


setInterval(function() {
$('li[data-userid=8403]').remove();
}, 1000);

1. Install tampermonkey
2. New script
3. Paste the code
4. Change the userid= to whoever you don't like, any rank
5. Make new lines for each userid.
6. ???
7. Petty ignoring

 

Code:

setInterval(function() {
$('li[data-userid=8403]').remove();
}, 1000)

Code:

8403

Spoiler

Spoiler

oof

 

It works but I'd still like this suggestion to be implemented just so it's a bit easier to ignore/unignore as I please

 

My method does work, but we shouldn't expect everyone to do that. And it has been said devs do not have authority so there is no reason to keep them unignored for staff reasons. +1 just cause it should be 2 seconds to fix

 

This isn’t so python can ignore rick, at least, that’s not why I support this.

Legitimately, there’s currently more than 1 developer and it isn’t just Rick running the ship. If anyone so happens to want to ignore irri they should (i wouldnt ). But admin pixel shouldn’t be ignored even if he’s a dev. Furthermore, in the future if there’s more devs to come about then what about ignoring them? Considering what I said earlier about ignoring staff vs ignoring devs it’s a legit reason to say we don’t need to know everything a dev says. Without having to rehash what I said their word has as much meaning as ours the commoners so why should we have to know all they say?

What I find to be particularly interesting at this point in the existence of this thread is not a single staff member has posted any counter arguments, but instead just posted dumb as if this has no weight, logic, or sway when it raises several valid points. Whether they’re just rating dumb because it’s a python v. Rick post or they truly don’t believe this should be a thing I would’ve expected at least 1 of them to say something by now.


The best counter to anything I said earlier is give us another reason why staff can't be ignored besides issuing warnings and how this reason applies to Developers. Developers don't enforce rules, they make content. If they don't enforce rules, their warnings aren't enforceable (unless just now out of the blue the upper administration decides that devs can enforce rules). If their warnings aren't enforceable, then regarding what I said earlier about the sole reason we can't ignore mods+ that means developers don't fall in that category.

@DieKasta @Toxrick @ant. @GimcSnooper @Destiny Blade

Let's see if that gets the ball rolling. Btw @Opalium

 

And I'M the instigator. Lol. The difference between you and I Python, is that I frankly don't give a damn what you have to say to/about me enough to report you for it. Part of life is accepting that people are going to say things you don't like/agree with. The sooner you accept it, the sooner this generation takes a step in the right direction. Nice attempt at a jab but, I know who my friends are, and I'm not worried about the ones that aren't.

 

Aye but the ones who aren't are worried about you
It's not like you say things that I dont agree with. I don't ignore people for having differing opinions
But when you continuously attempt to irritate me and prod at me whenever you can, something's up, and I don't want to deal with that if staff don't want to do something about it

Also I haven't reported you so idk what your point is there, if there is one
And you are an instigator, believe it or not. I didn't make this thread jabbing you until you commented on my "personal vendettas" lol

Good day